Jack Reacher: Never Go Back (2016)

dimanche 28 avril 2019

Was searching Spectrum On Demand to watch older Marvel Cinematic Universe movies on Saturday night (04/27/19) but I had settled on watching Jack Reacher: Never Go Back instead.

The movie is about ex-Army major Jack Reacher trying to help another Army major (who now occupies his old position) who is charged with a crime she didn't commit. During the course of the movie we get to see the bad guys who are after them and a young girl who could be Jack's daughter (who the bad guys are also going after).
Jack Reacher: Never Go Back (2016)

Shazam!

samedi 27 avril 2019

Saw the movie Shazam! at the Ward Theater in early April 2019.

The movie is about the wizard Shazam finding a replacement for himself, one attempt in the 1970 brings in a young boy from New York which the young lad doesn't measure up and he is sent back to where he came.

Through out the years the wizard keeps transporting other possible replacements to his lair but none of the people he tries out meets his needs. However the young lad now grown up as a Dr. Sivana who also researches into these disappearances finds out the process of getting to the wizard's lair. He manages to get to the lair and unleashes the deadly seven sins for his personally power. While defeating the wizard he doesn't kill him. Dr. Sivana heads back to his home and starts to wreck havoc.

Later the wizard does one more try for a replacement he gets teenager Billy Baston who deems worthy to receive the wizard's power. All Billy has to say is Shazam and he is transformed into an adult with some superpowers.

Parts of the movie is Billy trying to find out what his powers are thanks in part to his foster brother named Freddy who seems to have a handle on the super power thingy. Should also mention that this movie takes place in the DC Extended Universe so mentions and artifacts of Superman and Batman are shown in this movie.

And of course there is the fight between Dr. Sivana and Billy Baston's super powered form.
Shazam!

Preventing an “accidental” teen pregnancy

jeudi 25 avril 2019

This tip is primarily for parents of a teenager.

If, as the parent of a teen, you believe there is such a thing as an accidental pregnancy then you are ripe for your teen surprising you one day with an “accidental” pregnancy. In other words, given your present belief system, your child already knows that you'll accept "accidental" because your definitions of the words responsibility and intention are inaccurate and, you haven't delivered the following ultimatum:
  • Parent to teen: No babies until you are living on your own and can afford all the costs. A pregnancy would be your way of saying you don't value our support and that you'll be moving out immediately. We refuse to pay for your pregnancy because we know it will be premeditated; it won't be an accident. I mean what I'm saying. There will be no second chances about this matter. Do you understand? Be certain to tell each date about this consequence before you con them into begging for sex. Also, introduce me to any date with whom you are thinking of making out. I will ask them if they are prepared to pay 50% of all costs for raising a child for 18+ years, for any accidental pregnancy you may create.
Typically a teen's “accidental” pregnancy explanation will contain a lie, such as, “I don't know how it happened” (a covert victim-blame statement) as opposed to, “I conned him into wanting sex and impregnating me.” Or, “I arrogantly ignored everyone’s advice, specifically about accidental pregnancies, and impregnated her knowing full well it would upset her parents.” Few teens will acknowledge to both sets of parents, “I knew with absolute certainty that you didn’t want an accidental pregnancy problem. I knew it would not feel good to you and that it would be abusive of me to dump such a problem in your space, but, obviously I don’t respect you enough to honor your wishes. I blame you for my irresponsibility and disrespect of others; I knew that I could con you and Welfare into paying for my contemptuous behaviors.”

Let’s put it another way. Any teen who creates an accidental pregnancy is communicating to everyone (non-verbally) that he/she is not in-communication with his/her parents (there are no exceptions to this phenomenon). The implication being, “I wasn’t experiencing love and affection at home so I found someone to 'love' me.” [Yes, teens mistake physical intimacy for love]. If a teen isn’t observing affection between his/her parents, if he/she isn’t continually receiving warm experiential hugs from both parents (as it used to be) the teen automatically assumes that he/she is the cause and that they (the teen) don't inspire love and harmony and, that they are not lovable [no matter how many words a parent uses to assure a child that they are not the problem; the child knows that he/she is somehow responsible. I.e. "If I were Saint-like our relationships would be harmoniously loving"]. And so the child searches outside the family for the illusion of love/communication. I say "illusion" because what teens "in love" experience is not communication; the foundation of their relationship is based upon deception, both hiding from their parents the fact that they are having sex; the deceit, the humongous incomplete, serves as a barrier to sharing the joy of the experience with their (parents) creators.
  • “In-communication” meaning, the teen has not been taught how to communicate openly, honestly, and spontaneously—zero significant withholds—with his/her parents; instead, most parents train their child to deceive them, to withhold specific thoughts, especially, “I’ve been thinking of having sex with _____.” Such a parent-child relationship is fraught with breakdowns in communication.
Teens need to know that they have a positive effect on their parents. If a teen tries to inspire his/her parents to opt for healthy choices, or tries to bring the family together (perhaps back to the way it used to be), and fail, they experience invalidation; the thought being, "If I can’t affect happiness between my own parents then there must be something wrong with me." And so they begin living from the point of view that, ". . . something is wrong with me, I don't deserve happiness."

All teen pregnancies have one thing in common: No parent of either teen sat their teen down to have the “birds and bees talk.” Such talks always include—
  • 1) Who pays for what? The parent sits with the teen and assigns the following homework (including a date for the homework to be completed). The teen is to research and itemize in writing, all the estimated monthly expenses, including the $1000.00+ hospital birth costs).

    2) Having permission from, having the support of, both sets of parents to have sex. Parents who are withholding significant thoughts from each other are unconscious; they don't experience the guilt in the space between them and their teen.

    3) A discussion about the fact that sperm can swim through underwear, that pills and other types of contraceptives don't always work.

    4) A discussion about the fact that sperm sometimes squeezes out the opening of a condom or that condoms break or slide off when it's important that they don't, especially when there is a deceit being perpetrated. It's a perpetration that most males will immediately hide—that it broke—in hopes that his sperm were poor swimmers.

    5) The fact that there are no accidents when it comes to pregnancies.* All pregnancies are a manifestation of either a conscious or an unconscious intention. The “talk” must include discussions about the unconscious motivations that produce a supposedly unwanted pregnancy. Just because one isn’t aware of how or why they produced a result doesn’t mean that they didn’t intend it.

    6) And the all important subject—abortion or not—and, if yes, who pays for it?

    7) A man must know that if the woman refuses to have an abortion that he still has to pay 50% of all expenses through to age 18.
Few parents of a pregnant teen acknowledge that the teen simply manifested their (the parent's) unconscious intention. Yes, both the mother and father unconsciously intended the pregnancy; we know this to be true based upon the results their leadership-communication skills produced. What's worse, parents usually lie about it, they make the teen wrong and blame him/her, honestly believing that it has absolutely nothing to do with how they (the parent) communicated (verbally, non-verbally, and psychically) with their teen. Parents who are absolutely clear that they have no intention for their teen to produce a pregnancy problem do not create such a problem for themselves.

* All teen-mothers, when in-communication with a communication-skills coach, will acknowledged that they can now see that it was their intention to get pregnant, partly because they didn't want to confront the alternatives (learning how to communicate with her parents or studying for a profession). Many girls are able to see that they conned a boy into impregnating her which selfishly thwarted the possibility of him furthering his education due to bills (it's not a gift of love). Thwarting is something those in the process of crashing and burning do; they take as many down with them as possible (everyone's parents, relatives and friends). Others are able to see that a pregnancy was a way to make his/her parents wrong because they did a lousy parenting job.

Most all teen-mothers eventually have to acknowledge the possibility that their pregnancy might be the consequence of a perpetration, a deception, of deceiving her parents and of supporting her boyfriend in deceiving his parents. All teen fathers eventually have to acknowledge an "accidental" pregnancy as being a consequence of deceit, of conning his girlfriend into deceiving his and her parents so as to have sex. Both teen-parents live with the thought that though they might profess love for each other, neither truly have each others best interests at heart in terms of continuing education. Worse, both arrogantly expect others (parents and welfare) to pay for the costs of their perpetration.

Most all parents of their teen's pregnancy hid from their teen that they, the parent(s), when they were first dating, deceived their own parents by conning each other into having sex behind the backs of their date's parents. Parents who hypocritically "teach" truth-telling while hiding their own teen-perpetrations from their teen, train their teen to be deceptive.
Preventing an “accidental” teen pregnancy

RIP: Georgia Engel of The Mary Tyler Moore Show

lundi 22 avril 2019

https://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment...-dies-62421323

Georgia Engel has a local connection by being a UH grad.
RIP: Georgia Engel of The Mary Tyler Moore Show

Kate Smith's God Bless America Banned

https://deadline.com/2019/04/kate-sm...ca-1202598809/

What did Kate Smith tweet that got her banned?
Kate Smith's God Bless America Banned

Requesting feedback from educators

mercredi 17 avril 2019

Definition of Responsibility Test:

Ask all the teachers in any school to relate to you (in writing—with 3 examples) the definition of the word responsible and you'll get as many different answers as there are teachers. At first glance this seems to be Trump-like unbelievable,* however, it's supported by the facts—most divorced couples became stuck blaming each other for the breakdowns in communication and life-time smokers have successfully sued tobacco companies for lung cancer.

Premises:
  • All breakdowns in communication between two can be traced to the fact that both** have their own unique definition of the word responsible. Specifically, the word "cause" is missing from their definition.
  • If life ain't working as you say you'd like then you have a misunderstanding about the definition of the word responsible.
Here are five Yes/No questions that will either confirm or expand upon your definition of the word responsible. Read and vote—in your mind—yes or no:
  • My leadership-communication skills affect the successes of those around me, at home and work.1
  • My leadership-communication skills affect my partner's health.2
  • I have started all the arguments in my intimate relationship.3
  • How I co-create an agreement determines whether it will be honored.4
  • Those around me have no choice other than to be as honest with me as I am with them and all others.5
* It's unbelievably irresponsible that an education major can graduate without being clear about the definition of the word responsible.

** The word both is a reminder that a person who is clear about responsibility simply doesn't relate intimately with a blamer. Blamers always attract blamers. A person who operates from integrity can experience another's out-integrity—it's an aura thing.

Elaborations:

1 ...successes... If you answered "no," then you are addicted to blaming; predictably you have attracted, or will attract, a partner who blames. You will train them to deceive you, to hide as many thoughts from you as you hide (or have hidden) from your parents. You will (using your present non-verbal leadership-communication skills) train your child to deceive you—your child will simply mirror your integrity. Blamers teach their children to deceive them and others—evidenced by the fact that the majority of teens con each other into deceiving both sets of parents so as to have sex.

2 ...health... If you answered "no," then your leadership-communication skills don't inspire those around you to opt for healthy choices. Such a relationship usually means that both have non-verbally agreed; "I won't call you on your stuff as long as you don't call me on mine." (Read: Communications in Support of Health)

3 ...arguments... If you answered "no," then you are addicted to blaming. You have attracted, or will magnetically attract, a blamer; your relationship will consist of lots of breakdowns in communication. More precisely, you are an argument, a goader, looking for a sparring partner. You are unconsciously setting up your partner to recreate each and every perpetration, every abusive childhood argument you started (those you have yet acknowledged to yourself or your "victim" that you know didn't feel good), so as to recall and complete those incompletes through to mutual satisfaction.

4 ...agreements... If you answered "no," then you have yet to learn that those you interact with have no choice other than to mirror your integrity. It's time to study the subject of intention, specifically, that we are always manifesting our intentions. When we produce a result other than envisioned we act surprised at the result we produced with our leadership communications—this, because we were unconscious when we made the agreement; when our integrity is out we pay ourselves back by setting it up for others (or the "universe") to thwart us.

5 ...honesty... If you answered "no," then you are unconscious; you are dragging around incompletes into each present-day interaction—life's unacknowledged perpetrations (thefts. deceits, and abuses). Predictably, you will withhold a significant thought from a prospective partner on your very first date; he/she will have no choice other than to mirror your integrity—so they too will hide something significant from you. All divorced couples withheld a significant thought from each other on their very first date. "With 44+ years of coaching individuals and couples I have not found an exception to this phenomenon." —Kerry

Read this definition of responsible and do the test again. A definition of the word responsible.
To restore and maintain your integrity do The Clearing Process for Professionals.
To restore and maintain the integrity of a relationship do The Clearing Process for Couples.
To restore and maintain the integrity between you and your child do The Clearing Process for a Parent and a Young Person.
Requesting feedback from educators

Bernie kicks butt on FOX

mardi 16 avril 2019

Martha was the typical clueless ''just sayin'' partisan hack while Sanders wiped the floor with her nonsense and came out shining, as usual. https://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi...e_sanders.html
Bernie kicks butt on FOX

Lala Lakers

lundi 15 avril 2019

Lala Lakers

Tiger's Back

Tiger's Back

Creating a marriage vow that precludes cheating, etc.

vendredi 12 avril 2019

Creating a marriage vow that precludes cheating, etc. a.k.a. The Fidelity Agreement

This tip is about declaring up-front the kinds of behaviors/activities that are totally unacceptable—behaviors that will automatically trigger the divorce/annulment clause of your unique marriage vow—with absolutely no second chance. This tip is about creating an agreement, a vow, that defines ones boundaries about cheating, physical abuse, and specific illegal/unethical activities.1

Premises:
  • 1. Cheating (deceiving another) is abusive.
    2. It's abusive to use your leadership-communication skills to set up another to deceive you.
    3. All infidelities are premeditated abuse (abuse of oneself and of another).
    4. Anyone who supports a leader in cheating on his/her spouse is sabotaging the leader's organization, its mission/goals; the professed love is a lie.
    5. What's missing in all instances of infidelity is respect.
    6. To forgive someone you manipulated into deceiving you causes even more disrespect.2
    7. Cheating on a partner dooms their relationship with you to a life with little or no joy or drug-free ecstasy.
    8. With spousal infidelity or abuse there are no victims or perpetrators—only unconscious cons conning each other.
    9. The partner who doesn't insist that the other acknowledge the first abusive communication becomes cause for all successive abuses. I.e. A: "That didn't feel good. I'd like to hear you say that you know it was abusive." B: "I get that that was abusive." A "Thank you."
    10. Marriages without a fidelity agreement have an implied non-verbal agreement that cheating will probably be forgiven.
This tip is about consciously including a fidelity agreement in your marriage vow. I say consciously because a marriage vow that does not contain a verbal/written fidelity agreement does in fact contain an implied3 non-verbal agreement; such a vow non-verbally implies that cheating will possibly be allowed or forgiven. We know this to be true based upon the results typical marriage vows produce (approx 41% of divorced couples acknowledge infidelities).

A fidelity agreement is a wedding gift to you from millions and millions of divorced couples who, when they were exchanging marriage vows, never dreamed (self-righteously could not conceive) that cheating would take place during their unique marriage. Such arrogance begs to be humbled.

A fidelity agreement acknowledges that implied agreements have an effect. If you don't verbally co-create a Fidelity Agreement you both are unconsciously implying that cheating might be supported or forgiven. After reading this tip infidelity would not be an unconscious act, it would in fact be premeditated abuse; equally so, if you set up your spouse to cheat on you, referred to as entrapment.

This fidelity agreement is so clear that your wedding guests, both sets of parents, and any/all witnesses to the ceremony, will not support either of you in blaming the other or suing the other for alimony, possessions, or child custody in the event you cheat on your spouse or, if you manipulate or cause/intend your spouse to cheat on you. It precludes either spouse from later blaming the other, saying. "I didn't know." "I had no idea . . ." "I thought we were happy."

Cheating/illegal activities take place when both partners become stuck doing their imitation of communication. There is no such thing as an innocent spouseall unethical activities are enabled by an equally powerful spouse/partner, a con, one who has successfully developed a powerful innocent naive "take care of poor ignorant me" act (you can trust me to not insist that 'we' do business totally legally). In a loving relationship neither partner dares insult/offend the other with any questionable activity, such is their respect for each other, both sets of families, and all others.

Of the 41% of divorced marriages few were conscious enough to know they were lying when they swore to each other, before God, ". . . till death do us part." Most believed they were telling the truth; few were aware that that specific unconscious lie supported (caused) the outcome. A lie believed does not make it the truth.

Fidelity Agreement:

To preclude cheating include the following Fidelity Agreement (your words of course):
  • "If either of us cheat on the other the marriage is automatically annulled. All claims to our home, finances, possessions, and child custody are at the discretion of the other."
The word "annulled" is used to draw attention to the fact that your definition of a marriage includes fidelity. If cheating takes place then by definition the marriage is over—your ceremony included the typical sneaky non-verbal implied option to cheat.

For a Fidelity Agreement to work family and wedding guests must communicate this Wedding Guest Vow to the engaged couple: Again, your words:
"You are agreeing with me that you will call me or another guest the first time an upset or an experience of abuse is not resolved through to mutual satisfaction within 72-hours. Do we have an agreement?"
If a guest cannot facilitate completion of an incident he/she will call another wedding guest and together they will intervene. This agreement precludes partners from accumulating upsets and blaming the other for the results their leadership-communication skills are producing. It acknowledges that both partners know that they alone cause (start) all arguments).

1 Illegal/unethical activities: Such as with taxes, home/car insurance fraud, or food and rent welfare/subsidies. Making personal survival more important than supporting the financial well-being of others.

2 All "victims" of cheating can, during a communication consultation, recall all they did and did not do to intend the cheating. With infidelity, as with spousal abuse, there are no victims or perpetrators, only unconscious blaming cons.

3 Implied agreement: Most couples have an implied agreement to return home each night. If one breaks that agreement all hell breaks loose. The prevailing implied non-verbal agreement, the one that's unconsciously included in most of today's wedding vows, is, . . . if I cheat on you I expect you to accept my apology and forgive me and remain married to me. And, if you cheat on me I will badmouth you to others and blame you rather than acknowledge that my leadership-communication skills intended the result. We know this is the agreement because of the results.

4 If you are afraid to bring this subject up with your intended then you will most certainly cause the relationship to fail. If there is fear in the relationship there can be no open, honest, and spontaneous communication. If you withhold this tip from your betrothed it non-verbally grants him/her permission to withhold his/her thoughts of choice from you. Such behavior is in fact abusive. Abuse always produces undesirable results.
Creating a marriage vow that precludes cheating, etc.

Marisa Yamane leaves KHON

mercredi 10 avril 2019

https://www.staradvertiser.com/2019/...ism-authority/

You see ex-newscasters from time to time on newscasts as a spokesperson for companies in their new careers.
Marisa Yamane leaves KHON

2019 NCAA Men's Basketball Champions

http://www.hawaiiprepworld.com/featu...virginia-team/

Yes Virginia, there is a national champion.
2019 NCAA Men's Basketball Champions

Need feedback for article

mercredi 3 avril 2019

Requesting feedback. Heads up, it's a bit outside the box; it might trigger upset/anger.

Generation after generation we high school graduates have been submitting our teachers to the humiliation of having to pathetically beg, or strike, for pay raises, supplies and maintenance funds. In communication coaching this behavior of ours is referred to as thwarting. Clearly we have not been trained to positively1 acknowledge our teachers, to bring our mentors along with us financially. I.e. Rarely does an upper-income high school graduate send gifts of appreciation to any teacher. The subject of acknowledgment is just not taught; what we do learn is covert thwarting (also referred to as couch potato leadership).

This phenomenon begs the question, what's the source of us thwarting our teachers?

Premise: Things were going well with a teacher and then something, an interaction, a communication with that specific teacher, and nothing has been the same since. It was one of many forks in the road for both the student and the teacher. That incident is referred to as an incomplete.

In a personal relationship unconscious thwarting begins when one partner communicates (verbally, non-verbally, physically, or psychically) in a way that doesn't feel good to the other—referred to as an abusive communication, and, who doesn't verbally acknowledge the abuse timely. I.e. Father to son: "I get that my yelling at you earlier today didn't feel good." An abuse that's not responsibly acknowledged remains as an incomplete in the back of the mind—affecting all outcomes—usually for life.

We have been been taught to communicate by education majors who themselves were taught by college/university speech-communication professors who use the Adversarial Communication Model (pass-fail, blaming, withholding, getting ahead at another's expense). Most2 high school grads have not been taught to communicate responsibly3 nor have they been guided so as to experientially discover the correlation between personal integrity and outcomes.

When someone withholds a significant thought from a significant other it automatically, instantaneously, causes the deceived partner to also withhold an equally significant thought.4 In truth, teachers are missing certain leadership-communication skills; leadership training is not included in any education major's curriculum which accounts for the fact that 25% of the nation's college freshman require remedial composition and comprehension courses to learn what teachers failed to communicate K-12.

This same thwarting phenomenon takes place between a student and a teacher. If a teacher doesn't conduct regularly scheduled clearings throughout the week they train (cause) students to withhold thoughts of disrespect, upsets and anger, which are later communicated to teachers come pay-raise voting time.6

Note #1: It's not that high school graduates (the community's citizens) consciously vote against pay raises, we do it unconsciously. At some level it doesn't seem right to pay teachers more because the mind (with its addiction to blaming) believes that if teachers had done their job, had they not been connable, we'd be more successful, especially in our relationships—at best we'd all have better penmanship.

Note #2: As with sales professionals, a teacher's wages perfectly mirror his/her leadership-communication skills. The leadership-communication skills it takes to effect satisfactory fundings are the exact same skills it takes to communicate subject matter (no reasons, no excuses).

1 "positively" refers to the fact that we have been (albeit irresponsibly and not generously) acknowledging our teachers. The problem is that the way we have been acknowledging teachers affects our own prosperity. Thwarting, even unconscious thwarting, has undesirable consequences. Teachers know that we think they don't deserve as much pay as mechanics or plumbers but they don't know exactly why (after all, thinks a teacher, we're the ones who taught them to succeed financially). Teachers are not skilled at identifying (the incident, the specific communication) that causes you to thwart them. Graduates have no easy convenient way of critiquing teachers effectively so teachers can't put in correction for the next year.

2 "most" refers to the exception of Mormon students whose religion teaches acknowledgment.


3 "responsibly" Ask all the teachers in every school to write down the definition of the word responsible and you'll get as many different answers as there are teachers.

4 All divorced couples (yes all) withheld a significant thought (a deal-breaker) from each other on their very first date; each unconsciously, non-verbally, gave the other permission to withhold certain thoughts.

5 Columbine-type shooters daily communicated, non-verbally, that something was not right and none of their teachers had been trained how to acknowledge (to get) the anger.


6 Teachers have not studied how to consciously, positively, affect behaviors through acknowledgement; students are missing specific acknowledgment skills.

Leadership Tips for Teachers:

1) Two new prerequisites for education majors:

2) An aware principal conducts anonymous surveys each Friday. He/she hands students a list of the school's staff to be rated 1-10. Done anonymously it's an excellent tool for coaching teachers.

3) An aware principal provides an anonymous online teacher/school evaluation form for seniors and parents upon graduating.

4) There is another way of relating/communicating, another communication model, that produces favorable results for all concerned (read about the Communication-Skills Tutorial for Teachers).

5) The leadership-communication skills it takes to effect satisfactory wages, supplies, and maintenance funds are the exact same skills it takes to communicate subject matter.

6) An aware principal schedules regular parent-teacher-graduate support groups. The bi-monthl support group addresses all relationship/communication problems.
Need feedback for article